Hemodynamic consequences of premature ventricular contractions: Association of mechanical bradycardia and postextrasystolic potentiation with premature ventricular contraction-induced cardiomyopathy.

BACKGROUND: The relationships between hemodynamic consequences of premature ventricular contractions (PVCs) and development of premature ventricular contraction-induced cardiomyopathy (PVC-CM) have not been investigated. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to correlate concealed mechanical bradycardia and/or postextrasystolic potentiation (PEP) to PVC-CM. METHODS: Invasive arterial pressure measurements from 17 patients with PVC-CM and 16 controls with frequent PVCs were retrospectively analyzed. PVCs were considered efficient (ejecting PVCs) when generating a measurable systolic arterial pressure. PEP was defined by a systolic arterial pressure of the post-PVC beat ≥5 mm Hg higher than the preceding sinus beat. Every PVC was analyzed for 10 minutes before ablation, and the electromechanical index (EMi = number of ejecting PVCs/total PVC) and postextrasystolic potentiation index (PEPi = number of PVCs with PEP/total PVC) were calculated. RESULTS: EMi was 29% ± 31% in PVC-CM and 78% ± 20% in controls (P <.0001). PEPi was 41% ± 28% in PVC-CM and 14% ± 10% in controls (P = .001). There was no control in groups of low EMi or high PEPi. EMi and PEPi were not significantly correlated to left ventricular dimensions or function in PVC-CM patients. PVC coupling interval was related to both ejecting PVCs and PEP. CONCLUSION: Patients with PVC-CM more often display nonejecting PVCs and PEP compared to controls.

A New Combined Parameter to Predict Premature Ventricular Complexes Induced Cardiomyopathy: Impact and Recognition of Epicardial Origin.

INTRODUCTION: Reversible premature ventricular complexes-induced cardiomyopathy (PVC-CMP) is a well-described, multi-factorial entity. Single predictors, such as PVC burden or QRS duration, may not apply equally to all patients in contemporary unselected populations including patients with structural heart disease (SHD) or with particular origin such as epicardial (EPI) PVC. We sought to evaluate clinical criteria associated with PVC-CMP notably focusing on the EPI origin impact and ECG recognition and the value of a new composite predictor of PVC-CMP, the PVC-CMP-Index. METHODS AND RESULTS: We studied 107 consecutive patients (69 men; mean age = 56 ± 16 years) with frequent PVC (23.1 ± 11.5%) referred for PVC ablation. Thirty-six patients (33.6%) had an underlying SHD and 25 patients (23.4%) an EPI PVC origin. After a mean follow-up of 22.7 ± 15.3 months, 72.9% achieved a long-term successful ablation and 54.2% had PVC-CMP. PVC-CMP prevalence was significantly higher in patients with an EPI compared to endocardial PVC focus (84.0% vs. 45.1%, respectively, P < 0.001). EPI PVC origin (OR = 68.7 IC95% [3.5-1363], P = 0.005), as well as SHD (OR = 12.3 IC95% [1.6-92.6], P = 0.015), was independent predictor of PVC-CMP. While PVC burden (AUC = 0.78) or PVC-QRS width (AUC = 0.68) independently predicted PVC-CMP, the PVC-CMP-Index (values ≥39) defined as: PVC burden (0-1) × PVC-QRS width (milliseconds) × a constant C (1.28 for SHD or 2 for ECG suggesting EPI origin based on our ECG 3-step algorithm), highly correlated with PVC-CMP (AUC = 0.91, sensitivity = 93%, specificity = 80%). CONCLUSION: We developed a new index, which incorporates PVC burden, QRS width, and presence of SHD or suspected EPI origin that best predicted PVC-CMP.